Skip to main content
Talk to an expert
Work/JCB
ReplatformAutomotive & partsCW-029-RP-AU

JCB: rebuilding automotive and parts around catalogue depth and account buying.

A 3-month replatform for automotive and parts, shaped around catalogue depth, catalogue governance, account ordering, technical product information and B2B, D2C and Wholesale buying.

JCB's operating scale meant the commerce platform had to support specialist catalogue depth, product information, operational systems and account buying without losing customer confidence or continuity.

3
Month project
Kickoff to go-live
7
Platforms
Adobe Commerce, Shopify Plus, Akeneo PIM, Adobe Campaign +3
7
System integrations
SAP ERP, Ebay Marketplace, Multi-depot Inventory, Custom Order Management (OMS) +3 +3 more
3
Commerce models
B2B, D2C and Wholesale
Read onWhat was actually wrong, what we did, and what could have gone wrong.
02
The problem

What was actually wrong

Product information, catalogue structure and supplier feeds were likely sources of operational friction, with editorial and trading teams working around fragmented data.

This was not a standard ecommerce build. The platform had to handle parts identification, specialist catalogue depth, technical data, account buying, pricing imports, depot stock and the systems behind each order.

Trade buyers and account customers needed account-based pricing, repeat ordering and visibility of their own purchase history without friction.

Machinery parts commerce depends on more than product names and images. Buyers need catalogue structure, technical information and product relationships that help them identify the right part with confidence.

Stock was not one flat number. Depot location, availability and fulfilment context had to remain meaningful so customers and order teams could rely on what the platform showed.

Business customers also needed the platform to reflect how they buy: parent and child account relationships, repeat purchase, order history, account documents and the correct pricing and stock context.

The commerce layer had to sit cleanly alongside ERP, tax and fulfilment, without turning every operational dependency into a launch risk.

The platform change also depended on product information being structured, enriched and governed well enough to support the catalogue. Product data was a major workstream within the wider commerce delivery, not a separate outcome claim.

03
The risk

What was at stake

When account-based pricing, repeat ordering and purchase-history visibility slip, trade and account customers lose confidence in the site and push work back onto sales and support.

If parts data, technical information, price or depot availability drift, a customer can lose confidence before adding an item to the basket, choose the wrong part, or move the question back to customer service for manual checking.

For repeat buyers and trade accounts, uncertainty creates friction every time an order is placed again. Wrong-part risk, unclear account terms and a harder repeat-order path can frustrate buyers and move the burden back to account teams and support.

Once a buying habit moves elsewhere it is expensive to win back. The consequence of inaction is not dramatic; it is cumulative.

04
The work

Five things, in order.

  1. 01
    Mapped the buying journey before the interface
    Started with how customers actually order here: account relationships, repeat-buy patterns and the operational context behind each purchase. Purchase history, documents and parent-child account behaviour had to support the journey rather than sit outside it.
  2. 02
    Rebuilt the commerce foundation around how the business operates
    Rebuilt the commerce foundation around the operational logic the business already depended on, without resetting what already worked.
  3. 03
    Connected the systems that the storefront cannot work without
    The commerce layer had to sit cleanly alongside ERP, tax and fulfilment without coupling the launch to every system on day one.
  4. 04
    Brought product data into one governed workstream
    Product information, enrichment and catalogue structure were treated as a delivery workstream that enabled the commerce change. Technical data and downloads had to remain connected to the product context buyers used to identify the right item.
  5. 05
    Scoped the rules per audience, not per platform
    Account-led ordering and self-serve buying were shaped as distinct journeys on the same foundation. Local catalogue, depot, inventory, delivery and pricing rules had to remain coherent for the buyer context in front of the screen.
05
Systems

Platforms and integrations

The customer-facing platform was one part of the operating system. The project also depended on operational data, product information, inventory and communication systems, with clear boundaries for what each one supported and what customers could rely on.
Adobe Commerce (Powered by Magento)
Customer-facing commerce platform
Provided the customer-facing commerce platform for catalogue, account and ordering journeys. The platform could only present information it received from the operational and product systems around it. It mattered because a mismatch could become visible through product, account, stock or order information.
Shopify Plus
Customer-facing commerce platform
Provided the customer-facing commerce platform for catalogue, account and ordering journeys. The platform could only present information it received from the operational and product systems around it. It mattered because a mismatch could become visible through product, account, stock or order information.
Akeneo PIM / PXM
Product information platform
Provided the product information platform used to structure, enrich and prepare catalogue data for connected channels. Product data work depended on clear boundaries between this platform, upstream data and each receiving channel. It mattered because a mismatch could become visible through product, account, stock or order information.
Adobe Campaign
Project platform
Supported the Adobe Campaign connection within the commerce operation.
Custom Order Management (OMS)
Order management integration
Connected order management as part of the operational flow around commerce. Order journeys depended on a clear handoff between the customer-facing platform and order processing. It mattered because a mismatch could become visible through product, account, stock or order information.
Multi-depot Inventory
Stock and availability dependency
Represented stock by operational location so availability stayed useful to buyers and order teams rather than reduced to one total. Availability and fulfilment choices depend on depot-level inventory remaining aligned with commerce. It mattered because stock is only useful when its location, availability and fulfilment meaning match what the customer can rely on.
SAP ERP
Operational business data system
Provided operational context for account, order, pricing and fulfilment data used by the commerce experience. Commerce depended on an agreed boundary between ERP-held business data and the customer-facing platform. It mattered because a mismatch could become visible through product, account, stock or order information.
Warehouse Management System (WMS)
Warehouse integration
Supported warehouse and fulfilment processes connected to the commerce operation.
Adobe Digital Experience
Project platform
Supported the digital experience layer within the project platform stack.
Salesforce CRM
CRM integration
Connected customer relationship data as part of the operating stack. Customer-facing journeys depended on a clear boundary between CRM context and commerce. It mattered because a mismatch could become visible through product, account, stock or order information.
Word Press CMS
Experience platform
Supported the experience and content layer within the project platform stack. Its boundary with commerce and connected content flows needed to remain clear. It mattered because a mismatch could become visible through product, account, stock or order information.
Adobe Analytics
Supporting platform layer
Supported the Adobe Analytics connection within the commerce operation.
06
Risk control

Difficult parts

ERP dependency
Account, order, pricing and fulfilment data depended on the ERP boundary. A stale or ambiguous hand-off could surface as the wrong account context, order state or delivery expectation. How we held it: Define which operational fields the ERP owns, how commerce consumes them and how failed or delayed exchanges are identified before they affect an order.
Platform maintainability
Commerce and digital experience capabilities sat across more than one platform. Unclear boundaries could make routine change harder and allow overlapping ownership to create inconsistent behaviour. How we held it: Keep platform responsibilities explicit, document the joins and carry those decisions into support so future changes do not reopen settled architecture questions.
Account ordering
B2B and direct buying shared a platform, but account hierarchies, purchase history, documents, pricing and order paths could differ sharply by buyer. How we held it: Model account relationships and permissions explicitly, then test repeat-order and self-serve journeys against the correct customer, price and document context.
Product information
Catalogue structure, technical content and operational product data could move at different cadences. Drift risks putting incomplete, inconsistent or misleading information in front of a buyer choosing a specific item. How we held it: Separate ownership for product content, technical data, stock and price, then make each storefront dependency visible and reviewable through the product journey.
Timeline
The recorded project length set a fixed delivery context for a broad platform and integration scope. How we held it: Sequence decisions around the highest operational dependencies and flag any scope trade-off for editorial review rather than claiming an undocumented method.
Stock and pricing
Availability and price could vary by account, catalogue, depot or inventory source. A flattened view risks presenting a value that is technically current but wrong for the buyer in front of it. How we held it: Preserve the buyer and location context behind stock and pricing, define the source for each value and test how fallbacks behave when an operational update is late.
Support ownership
After launch, unclear ownership across parts data, pricing imports, inventory feeds and account behaviour could make operational faults slower to understand and resolve. How we held it: Carry the system boundaries, data ownership and recovery decisions into support so the team inherits the operating model as well as the platform.
07
Outcome

Results

3
Month project
Kickoff to go-live
+83%
Of revenue from search
Improvement recorded after launch
6x
System integrations
SAP ERP, Ebay Marketplace, Multi-depot Inventory, Custom Order Management (OMS) +3
+134%
Mobile transactions
Improvement recorded after launch
8x
Platforms
Adobe Commerce, Shopify Plus, Akeneo PIM, Adobe Campaign +3
+45%
Revenue YOY
Improvement recorded after launch
08
Client feedback

In the client's words

Absolutely love working with iWeb. We have direct access to the Delivery and Development teams, and their Partner Manager recommended excellent third-party vendors. They've been instrumental in our digital transformation.
Craig Jeffery, Ecommerce Manager, JCB
09
After launch

Ongoing support

The project did not end when the platform went live.

Support mattered because the automotive and parts still depended on parts data, pricing imports, account behaviour, inventory feeds, integrations and customer-facing information after launch.

Keeping the build decisions and system ownership visible gave the support team a clearer basis for tracing issues and maintaining the connected trading system after launch.

Next step

A project that looks like this one?

Send us the brief. You'll get a written response from a senior expert, usually within two working days.